Grounding It in the Right Documents
Pointing it at specific files instead of the whole tenant, which is what makes the answer wrong.
What it is for
Pointed at a whole tenant it answers from whatever it found; pointed at named files it answers from those. Most wrong answers here are a grounding problem, not a model problem.
The skill
Its answers are only as good as what it decided to read. Decide for it. - **Reference files explicitly** with `/` and the file name. An unreferenced prompt searches everything you have access to, which on a real tenant means it will find the 2023 draft as readily as the final. - **Say which version.** "the latest" is not a thing it can evaluate reliably across a SharePoint library with three copies. - **Ask for the source per claim**: "cite the file and slide/paragraph for each point." Then open one. The citation is the product. The failure worth knowing about: it will happily summarise a document you have access to but should not be quoting — an old salary review, an unreleased plan — because access is not the same as appropriateness. Before pasting a summary into a shared channel, check what it drew from. For meetings, ask for "decisions and owners, with the timestamp each was agreed" rather than a summary. A summary blends a suggestion and a decision into one sentence, and that is the sentence that causes the argument.
How to install it
1. Open the tool and start a new conversation, project or template. 2. Paste the text below wherever the tool keeps standing instructions — usually called system prompt, instructions, or persona. 3. Save it so it applies to every run rather than a single message.