Decide Which Papers Deserve a Full Read

به چه درد می‌خورد

وقتی چهل مقاله را یک‌جا وارد کرده‌ای، خلاصه‌ها ابزار تصمیم‌اند نه جایگزین خواندن. این متن سه پرسش می‌دهد که هر سند باید جوابشان را بدهد: چه چیزی اندازه گرفته شد، روی چه کسی، و برای اینکه به سوال تو ربط پیدا کند چه چیزی باید درست باشد. بعد پشته را سه دسته می‌کند؛ بخوان، فقط منبعش را بردار، بینداز دور. جایی که خلاصه کوتاه می‌آید، خودت داخل سند دنبال همان چند کلمه بگرد و «گفته نشده» را بنویس؛ همین هم یک تصمیم است. جلوی این را می‌گیرد که خلاصه خوش‌خوان یک مطالعه کوچک، در نوشته‌ات جای یک کارآزمایی بنشیند. جینی هنوز سرویس فعالی است و اشتراکش خودکار تمدید می‌شود، ولی توسعه‌اش کند شده؛ اول با یک سند امتحانش کن.

خود اسکیل کپی

Import the whole pile first, then screen it. Do not read in
import order - import order is arrival order, not importance.

Run one document through before you commit an afternoon to this.
Confirm you actually get a usable summary back for it. If you do
not, the pile is not the problem and no procedure fixes it.

For each document, read its summary and answer three questions in
your own words. If you cannot answer one, that is a finding, not
a failure:

  1. What did they actually measure or observe?
  2. On whom or what, and how many?
  3. What would have to be true for this to apply to my question?

When the summary is too thin to answer those, do not argue with
the tool in a longer question. Search inside the document for the
words that carry the answer - sample, participants, method,
outcome, control - and read those lines yourself. Write NOT STATED
beside any of the three you cannot fill. Two NOT STATEDs already
sort the paper.

Sort into three piles and write the pile name beside each title:

  READ  - answers your question directly, method is stated
  MINE  - you only want its reference list or one figure
  DROP  - wrong population, wrong outcome, or no method stated

Cap the READ pile at five. A sixth entry means something else
leaves.

The failure this prevents: a summary reads beautifully for a paper
whose method cannot carry your claim. Summaries flatten hedges -
"may be associated with" and "causes" come out looking the same -
and you end up citing a pilot study as if it were a trial.

Never cite from a summary. Before a document leaves the READ pile
and enters your draft, open the page the claim came from and read
the sentence yourself.

نصبش چطور است کپی

1. Open the tool and start a new conversation, project or template.
2. Paste the text below wherever the tool keeps standing instructions
   — usually called system prompt, instructions, or persona.
3. Save it so it applies to every run rather than a single message.

برای تو جواب داد؟

از کجا آمده